Working with Community Groups - Identifying Long Term Empties
Under the Community Grant Programme there seems to be an assumption that LAs will provide information to community groups on long term empties owned by individuals.But, this could breach the Data Protection Act ( Bexley?). If a Community Group was acting as a LA's agent to do empty property work , could we share information within the DPA?
Carson Millican
- Forums

Are they your agents?
Hi Carson
First, a basic principle. The DPA defines Data Controllers and Data Processors. The Council will be the Data Controller in the case you describe. A Data Processor is a third party organisation that processes the data on behalf of the Data Controller. This is considered a normal arrangement under the Data Protection Act. If it were not the case, then organisations like Capita or Liberata would not be able to process Housing Benefit or Council Tax on behalf of Councils. The Data Controller does not need to get the permission of the Data Subject in order to use a third party Data Processor. it's worth pausing a moment to reflect on these points.
When passing information on to a third party Data Processor, there are two key points to bear in mind:
So in practice, where a Council wants to work in partnership with a community group they should ensure that:
I don't think the Service Level Agreement needs to be that big a deal, it is just a question of grasping the nettle and producing something. The other big issues are the source of the information you have got and whether the consent of the individual concerned was obtained or implied or needed in order to act on the data (ie to process it). But going back to the original point - if the Councilcan do it, then so can its third party Data Processor.
David Gibbens (EHN Policy and Support)